Show Summary Details

Abrams v. Johnson (1997)locked

Extract

It often falls to the United States Supreme Court to issue determinations regarding the difficult, controversial, and, in terms of its effect on the voting rights of many millions of Americans, critical issue of voter redistricting. One recent example of such a case was Abrams v. Johnson in 1997. In 1995 a number of residents of Georgia challenged the constitutionality of the state legislator's new redistricting plan, which attempted to increase the number of African American representatives in the United States House of Representatives by creating three black majority districts. In the case of Miller v. Johnson 1995 the court concurred with the complainants in denying the constitutionality of the plan on the grounds that race had been the determining factor in fashioning the new districts Back at square one the state legislator tried again this time creating just one African American majority district but again the plan was ...

You do not currently have access to this article

Login

Please login to access the full content.

Subscribe

Access to the full content requires a subscription